PM004
Managing Engagement of Project Resistant Stakeholders by Need Mapped Categorization
Partha S. Ghose
(The paper was presented by the author in the Project Management National Conference 2016, at Mumbai, India)
Abstract
Large infrastructure and manufacturing projects involve a large number of stakeholders. These stakeholders can be internal to the project boundary or external. Unlike the internal stakeholders whose primary objective is project success leading to growth of business, external stakeholders may have exceedingly diverse interests, often making a large section of them project resistant. With a large count of such stakeholders around the project, it pose a major challenge to execute the project successfully. Hence, their needs have to be analysed based on the outcome of which, they have to be engaged to turn them to neutral or supportive to the project. When it is a question of couple of thousands of stakeholders, understanding their behavioral pattern individually is indeed a challenge and quite often, not feasible.
The present article, therefore, endeavors to map the behavior of a population of such stakeholders with their predominant needs categorized under Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, power and influence they can exercise and group the stakeholders in six categories.
Once done, engagement strategy for each group can be worked out based on the group characteristics and they can be engaged, suitably linked to their basic needs.
Introduction
Managing stakeholders had always been a challenge while implementing a projects, particularly, if the project happens to be a green field endeavour. New terrain, new environment, culture and belief, socio-economic conditions, language spoken, demography etc. makes it very difficult for the project proponent to understand what kind of stakeholder management strategy will work. The challenge multiplies if the size of the project is large and it is a complex project like large construction, infrastructure and projects which are part of major Government programmes.
For the internal stakeholders, there is a clear objective and business rationale for successfully completing the project, which eventually benefit the organization with some share of benefit passing on to the internal stakeholders, directly or indirectly. Additionally, these stakeholders are in the ambit of a governance framework. These two factors play a significant role in keeping the internal stakeholders engaged and positive to the project.
Contrary to the above scenario, some of the stakeholders external to the project implementing organisation including project affected persons (PAPs), have exceedingly diverse interests, usually with no alignment to the project objectives, rather, a little or prejudiced knowledge of the project and its outcome. Some of these interests arise out of their genuine basic needs, while others are ostensible needs arising out of other considerations. Incorrect assessment of these expectations, more often than not, make a large section of them resistant to the project. Irrefutably, in such circumstances it becomes a major challenge to the project proponent to execute the project smoothly and successfully with such a large number of stakeholders opposed to the project. The answer to this tricky and delicate problem is to engage these stakeholders suitably with an aim to turn their attitudes from resistant to supportive or at least neutral.
Key question here is, who should be engaged in what manner considering the diversity of their interests. To answer this question, it is essential to understand their basic needs and expectations which are causing them to behave in a particular manner against the interest of the project. Since the population for a large complex project runs in thousands, understanding their behavioral pattern individually is not realistic.
To make such an analysis more realistic, the approach this article suggests is that all the stakeholders be grouped on the basis of their fundamental needs mapped to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Since the hierarchy already defines the kind of needs a particular level is associated with, the particular groups need will be known immediately without having to analyse their behavior individually.
As per Maslow (1943), the deficiency, or basic needs are said to motivate people when they are unmet. Also, the need to fulfil such needs will become stronger the longer the duration they are denied. For example, the longer a person goes without food the more hungry they will become and shall be more motivated to react. One must satisfy lower level basic needs before progressing on to meet higher level growth needs. As a ready reference, the graphical representation in Fig: 1 below:
Fig 1: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
From the above matrix following points emerge -
Now that the gaps have been identified between the current and desired levels of engagement, appropriate actions and communication strategy may be planned by the project team and implemented.
Stakeholder Management Plan
Having completed the stakeholder analysis, a comprehensive action plan needs to be developed for managing the stakeholders in such a way that their engagement level can at least be converted to the supportive level and in some cases to the leading level, followed by implementation, monitoring and a feedback cycle. Although the stakeholder management plan depends on the outcome of the analysis which has a strong relationship with the geographical location of the project site, culture of the region and locality, socio-economic profile of the area, environmental and climatic conditions, political status, etc., the following suggestions may be useful while developing such a plan and subsequent iterations based on feedback during the Control Stakeholder Engagement process.:
Category 1 and 2:
Category 3 and 4:
As stated earlier this category of stakeholders are aware of the project and may have a wide spectrum of agendas, ranging from quick revenue through gaining political mileage. Hence, for this category of stakeholders, a detailed analysis would be required through expert judgment or other stakeholders with experience of dealing with them in earlier projects. Once done, appropriate strategy can be formulated to upgrade their engagement level. An interesting aspect of this category is that, through sustained efforts, their engagement level can be changed to leading level in certain areas of the project.
Stakeholder analysis should also bring out probable negative impact that may be triggered because of certain responses planned in the stakeholder management process. Such secondary and tertiary impacts may result in additional negative impact. If such an impact cannot be anticipated during the initial qualitative analysis, it must be captured during the monitoring process and appropriate response planned.
Depending upon the length of the project, interim analysis of the stakeholders using similar tools as the initial analysis is suggested on a predetermined frequency.
It should be clearly understood that the effectiveness of the entire process depends on a well conceived and meticulously performed stakeholder identification process and a well drawn communication management plan aligned with the stakeholder management plan.
Reference:
Project Management Institute (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) —Fifth Edition. Newtown Square, PA:
About the author : Mr. Ghose is a post graduate in engineering and technology with 36 years of experience in large manufacturing industries in projects, operations and maintenance, of which in excess of 22 years were in project and program management of large and mega integrated projects in ferrous and non ferrous metallurgical sectors, some of which were green field. A certified Project Management Professional (PMP)® with experience in all knowledge areas, Mr. Ghose has been driving projects from the senior management level for last 15 years. Presently, he is associated with Welspun Group of India as a president and unit head for its Welspun Maxsteel Ltd unit, responsible for operations of the performing unit and integrated steel project.
Click here to edit text